Urate-lowering therapy, serum urate, inflammatory biomarkers, and renal function in patients with gout following pegloticase discontinuation.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Little is known about long-term clinical outcomes or urate-lowering (ULT) therapy use following pegloticase discontinuation. We examined ULT use, serum urate (SU), inflammatory biomarkers, and renal function following pegloticase discontinuation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of gout patients who discontinued pegloticase using the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry from 1/2016 to 6/2022. We defined discontinuation as a gap ≥ 12 weeks after last infusion. We examined outcomes beginning two weeks after last dose and identified ULT therapy following pegloticase discontinuation. We evaluated changes in lab values (SU, eGFR, CRP and ESR), comparing on- treatment (≤ 15 days of the second pegloticase dose) to post-treatment. RESULTS: Of the 375 gout patients discontinuing pegloticase, median (IQR) laboratory changes following discontinuation were: SU: +2.4 mg/dL (0.0,6.3); eGFR: -1.9 mL/min (- 8.7,3.7); CRP: -0.8 mg/L (-12.8,0.0); and ESR: -4.0 mm/hr (-13.0,0.0). Therapy post-discontinuation included oral ULTs (86.0%), restarting pegloticase (4.5%), and no documentation of ULT (9.5%), excluding patients with multiple same-day prescriptions (n = 17). Oral ULTs following pegloticase were: 62.7% allopurinol, 34.1% febuxostat. The median (IQR) time to starting/restarting ULT was 92.0 days (55.0,173.0). Following ULT prescribing (≥ 30 days), only 51.0% of patients had SU < 6 mg/dL. Patients restarting pegloticase achieved a median SU of 0.9 mg/dL (IQR:0.2,9.7) and 58.3% had an SU < 6 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: Pegloticase treats uncontrolled gout in patients with failed response to xanthine oxidase inhibitors, but among patients who discontinue, optimal treatment is unclear. Based on this analysis, only half of those starting another ULT achieved target SU. Close follow-up is needed to optimize outcomes after pegloticase discontinuation.

Prednisolone Versus Colchicine for Acute Gout in Primary Care: statistical analysis plan for the pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, and double-blinded COPAGO non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: To date, colchicine and prednisolone are two effective therapies for the treatment of acute gout but have never been compared directly in a randomized clinical trial. In addition, in previous trials of treating acute gout patients with concomitant comorbidities were often excluded due to contraindications to naproxen. STUDY DESIGN: This pragmatic, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, randomized, non-inferiority trial compares prednisolone with colchicine in terms of non-inferiority in patients with acute gout. Patients presenting to their general practitioner with acute gout can be included if the gout attack has occurred within the last 2 days. A total of 60 practices in the vicinity of three university medical centers (Greifswald, Göttingen, and Würzburg) participate in the study. The intervention group receives 30 mg prednisolone for 5 days, while the group of standard care receives low-dose colchicine (day 1: 1.5 mg; days 2-5: 1 mg). The first dose of treatment is provided at day 0 when patients present to the general practitioner due to an acute gout attack. From day 0 to day 6, patients will be asked to complete a study diary on daily basis regarding pain quantification. For safety reasons, potential side effects and the course of systolic blood pressure are also assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PLAN: N = 314 patients have to be recruited to compensate for 10% of dropout and to allow for showing non-inferiority of prednisolone compared to colchicine with a power of 90%. We use permuted block randomization with block sizes of 2, 4, and 6 to avoid imbalanced treatment arms in this multi-center study; patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The absolute level of pain on day 3 (in the last 24 h) is the primary outcome and measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS: 0-10). Using a multiple linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, and pain at baseline, prednisolone is considered non-inferior if the effect estimate including the confidence intervals is lower than a margin of 1 unit on the NRS. Average response to treatment, joint swelling and tenderness, physical function of the joint, and patients' global assessment of treatment success are secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: The trial will provide evidence from a direct comparison of colchicine and prednisolone regarding their efficacy of pain reduction in acute gout patients of primary care and to indicate possible safety signals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05698680 first posted on January 26, 2023 (retrospectively registered).

Assessment of the efficacy of alkaline water in conjunction with conventional medication for the treatment of chronic gouty arthritis: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic gouty arthritis, a prevalent metabolic disorder, has prompted interest in the role of diet and lifestyle in its management. This study examines alkaline water as a non-pharmacological adjunct to traditional medicine, hypothesizing its positive effects on uric acid levels and gout symptoms. METHODS: In this research, 400 chronic arthritis patients from Guangdong Hydropower Hospital (September 2021-September 2023) were randomly assigned to groups receiving varying concentrations of alkaline water alongside conventional Western medicine, or Western medicine alone. A 1-year follow-up involved assessments using visual analogue scales, joint swelling scores, functional assessment scales, and biochemical markers (serum uric acid, creatinine, urea nitrogen) for comprehensive evaluation. RESULTS: Pain relief: High-concentration alkaline water significantly reduced VAS pain scores posttreatment (P < .05). Joint swelling: Greatest improvement observed in high-concentration group (P < .001). Daily activity capability: Notable enhancements in daily activity scores in experimental groups (P < .05). Range of joint motion: All groups showed significant improvement posttreatment (P < .05). Inflammatory markers: Experimental groups experienced a notable decrease in C-reactive protein, especially in the low concentration group (P < .001). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate decreases were marginal and not statistically significant (P > .05). Interleukin-1ß and tumor necrosis factor-α levels significantly decreased, particularly in the low concentration group. Serum uric acid levels: Significant reduction in serum uric acid observed in all alkaline water groups (P < .05), contrasting with the control group. CONCLUSION: Alkaline water, particularly at high concentrations, effectively alleviated pain, reduced joint swelling, enhanced daily activities, and improved joint motion in chronic gouty arthritis treatment. It significantly reduced key inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, interleukin-1ß, tumor necrosis factor-α) and serum uric acid levels, suggesting its potential as a valuable adjunct in gout management. The limited impact on erythrocyte sedimentation rate warrants further investigation.

Intensive urate-lowering with pegloticase plus methotrexate co-therapy in uncontrolled gout patients with and without chronic kidney disease: A retrospective case series.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and gout commonly co-occur. Pegloticase lowers serum urate (SU) in uncontrolled gout patients but antidrug antibodies limit urate-lowering response and increase infusion reaction (IR) risk. Methotrexate (MTX) co-administration increases pegloticase response rate and mitigates IR risk but CKD limits MTX use. This pooled case series examined pegloticase + MTX co-therapy in uncontrolled gout patients with and without CKD. Cases of pegloticase + MTX co-therapy in existing datasets were retrospectively examined. Baseline eGFR classified patients as CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) or non-CKD (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Patient characteristics, treatment parameters, laboratory values, urate-lowering response rate (≥12 pegloticase infusions received and SU < 6 mg/dL just before infusion 12), and AEs were examined. Fifteen CKD (eGFR: 43.2 ±â€…11.3 mL/min/1.73 m2; SU: 8.6 ±â€…2.2 mg/dL), 27 non-CKD (eGFR: 82.9 ±â€…19.0 mL/min/1.73 m2; SU: 9.5 ±â€…1.7 mg/dL) patients were included. Comorbidity profiles were similar, but CKD patients were older (72.0 ±â€…9.9 vs 52.3 ±â€…14.3 years) and more often female (33.3% vs 7.4%). Treatment parameters were similar with 4-week MTX Run-in followed by mean of 14.7 ±â€…8.1 [CKD] vs 14.1 ±â€…7.1 [non-CKD] pegloticase infusions. However, CKD patients had lower MTX dose (14.8 ±â€…5.8 vs 19.3 ±â€…4.9 mg/week). Urate-lowering response was similar (92% vs 86%). eGFR increased during treatment in 60% of CKD (+11.5 ±â€…20.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, 87% stable/improved CKD-stage) and 44% of non-CKD (+4.2 ±â€…15.0 mL/min/1.73 m2) patients. AEs were similar (≥1 AE CKD: 53%, non-CKD: 67%; gout flare most-reported). One case each of pancytopenia and IR (mild) occurred in non-CKD patients. These real-world data show similar pegloticase + MTX efficacy in CKD and non-CKD patients. No new safety signals were identified, with most CKD patients showing renal function stability or improvement during therapy.

Allopurinol and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ischaemic heart disease: the ALL-HEART RCT and economic evaluation.

Background: Allopurinol is a xanthine oxidase inhibitor that lowers serum uric acid and is used to prevent acute gout flares in patients with gout. Observational and small interventional studies have suggested beneficial cardiovascular effects of allopurinol. Objective: To determine whether allopurinol improves major cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Design: Prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint multicentre clinical trial. Setting: Four hundred and twenty-four UK primary care practices. Participants: Aged 60 years and over with ischaemic heart disease but no gout. Interventions: Participants were randomised (1 : 1) using a central web-based randomisation system to receive allopurinol up to 600 mg daily that was added to usual care or to continue usual care. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes were non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for heart failure, hospitalisation for acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularisation, hospitalisation for acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularisation, all cardiovascular hospitalisations, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. The hazard ratio (allopurinol vs. usual care) in a Cox proportional hazards model was assessed for superiority in a modified intention-to-treat analysis. Results: From 7 February 2014 to 2 October 2017, 5937 participants were enrolled and randomised to the allopurinol arm (n = 2979) or the usual care arm (n = 2958). A total of 5721 randomised participants (2853 allopurinol; 2868 usual care) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis population (mean age 72.0 years; 75.5% male). There was no difference between the allopurinol and usual care arms in the primary endpoint, 314 (11.0%) participants in the allopurinol arm (2.47 events per 100 patient-years) and 325 (11.3%) in the usual care arm (2.37 events per 100 patient-years), hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.21); p = 0.65. Two hundred and eighty-eight (10.1%) participants in the allopurinol arm and 303 (10.6%) participants in the usual care arm died, hazard ratio 1.02 (95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.20); p = 0.77. The pre-specified health economic analysis plan was to perform a 'within trial' cost-utility analysis if there was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint, so NHS costs and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated over a 5-year period. The difference in costs between treatment arms was +£115 higher for allopurinol (95% confidence interval £17 to £210) with no difference in quality-adjusted life-years (95% confidence interval -0.061 to +0.060). We conclude that there is no evidence that allopurinol used in line with the study protocol is cost-effective. Limitations: The results may not be generalisable to younger populations, other ethnic groups or patients with more acute ischaemic heart disease. One thousand six hundred and thirty-seven participants (57.4%) in the allopurinol arm withdrew from randomised treatment, but an on-treatment analysis gave similar results to the main analysis. Conclusions: The ALL-HEART study showed that treatment with allopurinol 600 mg daily did not improve cardiovascular outcomes compared to usual care in patients with ischaemic heart disease. We conclude that allopurinol should not be recommended for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with ischaemic heart disease but no gout. Future work: The effects of allopurinol on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ischaemic heart disease and co-existing hyperuricaemia or clinical gout could be explored in future studies. Trial registration: This trial is registered as EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2013-003559-39) and ISRCTN (ISRCTN 32017426). Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 11/36/41) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 18. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

The purpose of the ALL-HEART study was to determine whether giving allopurinol to people with ischaemic heart disease (also commonly known as coronary heart disease) would reduce their risk of having a heart attack, stroke or of dying from cardiovascular disease. Allopurinol is a medication usually given to patients with gout to prevent acute gout flares. It is not currently used to treat ischaemic heart disease. We randomly allocated people aged over 60 years with ischaemic heart disease to take up to 600 mg of allopurinol daily (in addition to their usual care) or to continue with their usual care. We then monitored participants for several years and recorded any major health events such as heart attacks, strokes and deaths. We obtained most of the follow-up data from centrally held electronic hospital admissions and death records, making the study easier for participants and more cost-efficient. We asked participants in both groups to complete questionnaires to assess their quality of life during the study. We also collected data to determine whether there was any economic benefit to the NHS of using allopurinol in patients with ischaemic heart disease. There was no difference in the risk of heart attacks, strokes or death from cardiovascular disease between the participants given allopurinol and those in the group continuing their usual care. We also found no difference in the risks of other cardiovascular events, deaths from any cause or quality-of-life measurements between the allopurinol and usual care groups. The results of the ALL-HEART study suggest that we should not recommend that allopurinol be given to people with ischaemic heart disease to prevent further cardiovascular events or deaths.

Cardiovascular safety of febuxostat versus allopurinol among the Asian patients with or without gout: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The cardiovascular (CV) safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for the treatment of hyperuricemia among Asian patients is uncertain. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the CV safety profiles of febuxostat with allopurinol in Asian patients with hyperuricemia. A total of 13 studies were included. On the basis of the pooled results of cohort studies, febuxostat users were at a significantly higher risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.09, p < 0.01), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.35, p < 0.01) than allopurinol users, whereas no significant difference between febuxostat and allopurinol existed for urgent coronary revascularization (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98-1.16, p = 0.13), and stroke (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.91-1.01, p = 0.13). Nevertheless, that difference in results of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF; HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.35-1.53, p = 0.40) and all-cause death (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.49-1.51, p = 0.60) was not significant based on randomized controlled trials. In the Chinese subgroup, febuxostat could increase the risk of ADHF (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.48, p < 0.05), CV death (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.50, p < 0.05), and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, p < 0.05) compared to allopurinol. In conclusion, the use of febuxostat, compared with allopurinol among Asian patients, was associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse CV events.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of benzbromarone and febuxostat in gout and hyperuricemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Urate-lowering therapy (ULT) is widely recognized as the primary treatment for hyperuricemia and gout. Xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOI), particularly febuxostat, have gained popularity as a frontline approach. However, the divergent efficacy and safety between febuxostat and the traditional ULT drug, benzbromarone, remain poorly understood. This knowledge gap necessitates a comprehensive analysis and evidence update to guide drug selection for physicians and patients. METHOD: We conducted a systematic analysis by extracting relevant clinical studies from four medical literature databases. Forest plots, funnel plots, sensitivity analysis, Egger's test, and subgroup analysis were utilized to compare relevant indicators. RESULTS: The advantages and disadvantages of the two drugs were evaluated based on various indicators such as serum uric acid (SUA), triglyceride (TG), urinary uric acid (UUA), white blood cell count (WBC), total cholesterol (TC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and serum creatinine (SC). Benzbromarone demonstrated better efficacy in rapidly reducing SUA levels and inhibiting inflammation for hyperuricemia and gout patients. Febuxostat was slightly less effective in lowering SUA, but there was no significant difference in its impact on liver and kidney function after long-term use. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the superiority of benzbromarone in rapidly reducing SUA and inhibiting inflammation. Febuxostat shows comparable effects on liver and kidney function after long-term use. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians and patients in drug selection. Key Points • Benzbromarone stands out as a highly effective treatment for hyperuricemia and gout, offering rapid reduction of serum uric acid levels and potent anti-inflammatory effects. • When it comes to long-term use, febuxostat demonstrates comparable effects on liver and kidney function. This provides reassurance for patients who require extended treatment duration. • Moreover, our study goes beyond previous research by presenting a more comprehensive and detailed analysis.

Prescribing cascades of antigout medications from thiazide diuretics in gout-naïve hypertensive adults receiving first-line pharmacological management.

Prescribing cascade is a significant clinical problem but is often overlooked. We explore the incidence of the prescribing cascades of antigout medications related to thiazide treatment in gout-naïve hypertensive adults newly exposed to the pharmacological treatment. This population-based, retrospective cohort study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Registry Database. Gout-naïve hypertensive adults who were newly dispensed first-line antihypertensive drugs between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2016, were enrolled. Patients were divided into the thiazide group (n = 4192) and the non-thiazide group (n = 81,083). The non-thiazide group included patients who received an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker, calcium channel blocker, or beta-blocker. The study utilized propensity score matching and multivariable Cox regression models to investigate the prescribing cascade of antigout agents following antihypertensive treatment, adjusting for factors like age, sex, comorbidities, and concurrent medications. After propensity score matching, each group consisted of 4045 patients, with the thiazide group exhibiting a higher risk of being prescribed antigout medications across different time intervals post-treatment initiation. Specifically, adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the thiazide group were 2.23, 2.07, and 2.41 for < 30 days, 31-180 days, and > 180 days, respectively, indicating a sustained and significant risk over time. Comparative analyses revealed thiazide diuretics were associated with a higher risk of antigout medication prescriptions compared to other antihypertensive classes, particularly evident after 180 days. Subgroup analyses across various demographics and comorbidities consistently showed an increased risk in the thiazide cohort. Gout-naïve hypertensive adults newly dispensed thiazide had a higher risk of subsequently adding antigout agents than those taking other first-line antihypertensive medications. The awareness and interruption of these prescribing cascades are critical to improving patient safety.

Efficacy and safety of orlistat in male patients with overweight/obesity and hyperuricemia: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with elevated serum uric acid (SUA) levels and frequent gout flares. Losing weight can reduce the SUA level and gout flares. The effect of orlistat on SUA levels and gout flares in patients with overweight/obesity and hyperuricemia (HUA) has not been extensively studied. This study investigated the effects of orlistat on SUA levels and gout flares compared to placebo in overweight and obese patients with HUA. METHODS: A total of 72 Chinese patients with overweight/obesity and HUA were randomly divided into a placebo group (35, 48.6%) and an orlistat group (37, 51.4%); the trial lasted 12 weeks. The primary endpoints were the relative changes in body weight, the SUA level, and gout flares in the per-protocol population. RESULTS: Orlistat reduced the proportion of patients with gout flares (log-rank P = 0.023, hazard ratio = 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.85). There was no significant difference in SUA level between the two groups. The average weight loss of the orlistat group was 2.85 kg, and the average weight loss of the placebo group was 0.76 kg. The weight loss in the orlistat group was significantly greater than that in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to demonstrate that orlistat has no significant effect on SUA levels in patients with overweight/obesity and HUA. The utility of orlistat as an adjunct therapy to prevent gout flares during weight loss in patients with HUA was emphasized. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05496075.

Exploring the anti-gout potential of sunflower receptacles alkaloids: A computational and pharmacological analysis.

Gout, a painful condition marked by elevated uric acid levels often linked to the diet's high purine and alcohol content, finds a potential treatment target in xanthine oxidase (XO), a crucial enzyme for uric acid production. This study explores the therapeutic properties of alkaloids extracted from sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) receptacles against gout. By leveraging computational chemistry and introducing a novel R-based clustering algorithm, "TriDimensional Hierarchical Fingerprint Clustering with Tanimoto Representative Selection (3DHFC-TRS)," we assessed 231 alkaloid molecules from sunflower receptacles. Our clustering analysis pinpointed six alkaloids with significant gout-targeting potential, particularly emphasizing the fifth cluster's XO inhibition capabilities. Through molecular docking and the BatchDTA prediction model, we identified three top compounds-2-naphthylalanine, medroxalol, and fenspiride-with the highest XO affinity. Further molecular dynamics simulations assessed their enzyme active site interactions and binding free energies, employing MM-PBSA calculations. This investigation not only highlights the discovery of promising compounds within sunflower receptacle alkaloids via LC-MS but also introduces medroxalol as a novel gout treatment candidate, showcasing the synergy of computational techniques and LC-MS in drug discovery.

Development and characterization of liposomal formulations containing sesquiterpene lactones for the treatment of chronic gout.

Gout and hyperuricemia are characterized by high uric acid levels, and their treatment involves medications that have adverse effects. In this study, we evaluated oral liposomal formulations with eremantholide C and goyazensolide as a novel approach to reduce the toxicity associated with these substances while maintaining their anti-hyperuricemic activity. We characterized the formulations and evaluated them based on encapsulation efficiency and stability over 12 months and under simulated physiological environments. We determined the toxicity of the liposomal formulations in Caco-2 cells and the anti-hyperuricemic activity in rats. The formulations exhibited nanometric size, a narrow size distribution, and a negative zeta potential, indicating their stability and uniformity. The efficient encapsulation of the sesquiterpene lactones within the liposomes emphasizes their potential for sustained release and therapeutic efficacy. Stability evaluation revealed a small decrease in the eremantholide C concentration and a remarkable stability in the goyazensolide concentration. In Caco-2 cells, the liposomes did not exert toxicity, but did exhibit an antiproliferative effect. In vivo assays demonstrated that the liposomes reduced serum uric acid levels. Our study represents an advancement in gout and hyperuricemia treatment. The liposomal formulations effectively reduced the toxicity associated with the sesquiterpene lactones while maintaining their therapeutic effects.

How common are side effects of treatment to prevent gout flares when starting allopurinol?

The studyRoddy E, Bajpai R, Forrester H, et al. Safety of colchicine and NSAID prophylaxis when initiating urate-lowering therapy for gout: propensity score-matched cohort studies in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:1618-25.To read the full NIHR Alert, go to: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/alert/how-common-are-side-effects-of-treatment-to-prevent-gout-flares-when-starting-allopurinol/.

The prevalence, clinical reasoning and impact of non-standard anti-tuberculosis regimens at the initial prescription.

Regarding clinically-concerning non-standard initial anti-tuberculous (TB) regimens, few studies have examined their prevalence, risk factors and impacts. We recruited patients with drug susceptible TB and non-standard initial anti-TB regimens (NSTB group) and matched them with patients with standard initial regimens (STB group) in a 1:1 ratio. The risk factors and outcomes were analyzed. During the 11-year study period, we analyzed 50 (3.7%) patients with NSTB from a total set of 1337 patients with drug-susceptible TB. Pyrazinamide (60%) was the drug most commonly not prescribed in the NSTB group, followed by ethambutol (34%). Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors as underlying eye disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 8.869; 95% CI 2.542-30.949; p = 0.001), gout/hyperuricemia (aOR: 4.012 [1.196-13.425]; p = 0.024), and liver disease (aOR: 12.790 [3.981-41.089]; p < 0.001). The NSTB group had longer treatment durations (281 ± 121 vs. 223 ± 63 days; p = 0.003) and more occurrences of treatment interruption (26% vs. 8%; p = 0.021) than the STB group. In conclusion, NSTB occurs in around 3.7% of patients and is associated with longer treatment and more treatment interruption. The risk factors might include underlying liver and eye diseases, and gout. Further studies to improve non-standard initial regimens and prevent negative outcomes are warranted.

Discovery of a Novel Thienopyrimidine Compound as a Urate Transporter 1 and Glucose Transporter 9 Dual Inhibitor with Improved Efficacy and Favorable Druggability.

Gout and hyperuricemia are metabolic diseases characterized with high serum uric acid (SUA) levels that significantly impact human health. Lesinurad, a uricosuric agent, is limited to concurrent use with xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs) in clinical practice due to its restricted efficacy and potential nephrotoxicity. Herein, extensive structural modifications of lesinurad were conducted through scaffold hopping and substituent modification strategies, affording 54 novel derivatives containing pyrimidine-fused cyclic structures. Notably, the thienopyrimidine compound 29 demonstrated a remarkable 2-fold increase in SUA-lowering in vivo activity compared to lesinurad, while exhibiting potent inhibitory activity against the urate transporter 1 (URAT1, IC50 = 2.01 µM) and glucose transporter 9 (GLUT9, IC50 = 18.21 µM). Furthermore, it possessed a lower effective dosage of 0.5 mg/kg, favorable safety profile without any apparent acute toxicity at doses of 1000 mg/kg, and improved pharmacokinetic properties. Overall, we have discovered an efficacious URAT1/GLUT9 dual inhibitor for inhibiting urate reabsorption with favorable pharmacokinetic profiles.

The clinical benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors in people with gout.

Gout is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis worldwide and is characterized by painful recurrent flares of inflammatory arthritis that are associated with a transiently increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Furthermore, gout is associated with multiple cardiometabolic-renal comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. These comorbidities, potentially combined with gout flare-related inflammation, contribute to persistent premature mortality in gout, independently of serum urate concentrations and traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Although better implementation of standard gout care could improve gout outcomes, deliberate efforts to address the cardiovascular risk in patients with gout are likely to be required to reduce mortality. Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are approved for multiple indications owing to their ability to lower the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, hospitalizations for heart failure and chronic kidney disease progression, making them an attractive treatment option for gout. These medications have also been shown to lower serum urate concentrations, the causal culprit in gout risk, and are associated with a reduced risk of incident and recurrent gout, potentially owing to their purported anti-inflammatory effects. Thus, SGLT2 inhibition could simultaneously address both the symptoms of gout and its comorbidities.

Modulation of the dissolution with ASP from a supersaturated solution on a bionic platform for gout pathology crystals.

The core to the treatment of gout is the elimination of pathologic crystal, monosodium urate monohydrate (MSUM). The primary treatment available is to gradually dissolve the "culprit crystals" by lowering the blood uric acid concentration with medications, which often takes a long time and in severe cases must still be treated surgically. Herein, we developed a dynamic bionic platform based on a hydrogel composite membrane (HCM) to screen the direct facilitated solubilization of MSUM crystals by small organic molecules in bionic saturated, or even supersaturated, solutions. The customized and biologically safe (NAGA/PEGDA/NIPAM) HCM, which is consistent with the main amino acid composition of articular cartilage, well mimics the entire process of organic molecules leading to the dissolution of MSUM crystals in the joint system. With the verifications of this platform, it is shown that l-aspartic acid (ASP) significantly promotes the dissolution of MSUM crystals not only in saturated but also in supersaturated solutions. Furthermore, a novel mechanism called "crane effect" was used to explain this "dissolution effect" of ASP on MSUM, which stems from the ability of ASP to lock onto the surface of MSUM crystals through hydrogen bonding by virtue of its two carboxyl groups, and simultaneously its amino group lifts the uric acid molecules from the surface of MSUM crystals by virtue of interactions of hydrogen bonding. The results of bulk crystallization, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), powder X-diffraction (PXRD), and density-functional theory (DFT) studies are quantitatively consistent with this hypothetical "crane effect" mechanism. Hence, this HCM-based functional platform could provide entirely novel ideas and methods for drug design and screening for the treatment of pathological crystal diseases of gout.

The Effects of Pharmacological Urate-Lowering Therapy on Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults with Gout.

Cardiovascular disease is an important cause of mortality in older patients. In addition to the traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, hyperuricemia has been increasingly associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease. Uric acid itself has several unfavorable effects on the cardiovascular system, and hyperuricemia can lead to the development of gout. Gout is the most prevalent inflammatory rheumatic disease. Older patients with gout have an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality due to an increased prevalence of traditional risk factors, as well as the inflammatory burden of gout activity. As the prevalence of traditional risk factors and the prevalence of both hyperuricemia and gout are increasing in older adults, cardiovascular risk management in these patients is very important. This risk management consists of, on the one hand, treatment of individual traditional risk factors and, on the other hand, of urate lowering, thereby decreasing inflammatory burden of gout. However, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that urate-lowering therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular events. Moreover, from a cardiovascular point of view, there is no preference for one urate lowering drug over another in patients with gout, nor is there enough evidence to support a preference in patients with gout with increased cardiovascular risk. Personalized treatment in older patients with gout should be aimed at optimizing serum uric acid levels, as well as targeting traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to support the hypothesis that urate lowering reduces cardiovascular risk in older patients with gout.